Course Goals
Diversity and Disability
Instructor
Contact Information
Office HoursRequired Books
Course Requirements
Class Periods
Discussants
Attendance and Class Participation
Attendance and Class Participation Scoring
Papers
Daily Response Papers
Daily Paper Scoring
Final Project
Option A: Traditional Research Paper
Option B: Course Outline, Lesson Plan, or Study Guide
Option C: Creative Work
Final Project Deadline
Final Grading
Recommended Works
"The most powerful works of SF don't describe the future - they change it." - Annalee Newitz, io9. Become fluent in SF by studying some of the most-influential short stories that shaped the genre and the world we inhabit today - and tomorrow.
Gain an understanding of contemporary and future science fiction by studying the history of the genre and many of the great works that started important conversations about what it means to be human in a changing world. After reading a diversity of short SF and excerpts from longer pieces, we discuss how the genre got to be what it is today by examining the stories and their place in the evolution of SF, from the earliest prototypical examples through more recent work. Demonstrate your understanding of the genre by writing daily reading responses and a substantial final project.
Award-winning SF author and scholar Chris McKitterick leads the course.
Satisfies KU Core Goal 6, "Integration and Creativity," and serves as a capstone course. Available to undergraduate and graduate students. graduate students can take up to two 600-level courses for credit. Ask your advisor for details about how the various ways to enroll best fit your needs.
Everyone enjoys equal access to our offerings, and we actively encourage students and scholars from diverse backgrounds to study with us. All courses are also available to be taken not-for-credit for professionalization purposes by community members (if space is available). Click here to see our statement on diversity and inclusivity.
The Academic Achievement and Access Center coordinates accommodations and services for all eligible KU students. If you have a disability for which you wish to request accommodation and have not contacted the AAAC, please do so as soon as possible. Their office is located in 22 Strong Hall; their phone number is (785)864-4064 (V/TTY), or email them at achieve@ku.edu Feel free to contact me privately about your needs in this course.
In non-pandemic years, we usually bring in guest scholar-instructors, experts in the field with association with the Center. In addition, Founding Director James Gunn hopes to join us on occasion, and Director Chris McKitterick is available throughout the Institute for consultation and informal get-togethers.
|
McKitterick is a science-fiction author and scholar, Director of the Ad Astra Institute for Science Fiction and the Speculative Imagination, and teaches SF and creative writing at KU. He has been a professional writer for more than 20 years, an editor for nearly as long, managed technical writers and editors, and currently freelances for a variety of publishers. He writes not just SF stories and novels, but also nonfiction such as astronomy articles, technical documents, gaming supplements, scholarly articles, and journalism (and some poetry, too). His newest short fiction, "Ashes of Exploding Suns, Monuments to Dust," was on the Tangent Recommended Reading List and won the AnLab Award. Feel free to mine his experience for tips and advice about writing, editing, and the SF industry. His debut novel, Transcendence, is now in its second edition. He recently finished a far-future novel, Empire Ship, and has several other projects on the burners, including The Galactic Adventures of Jack & Stella. Read more about McKitterick here, or check out his personal website here. |
If you have questions, need assistance, or just want to chat about SF, drop McKitterick an email any time: cmckit.SF@gmail.com
Other contact info:
Academia.edu
Christopher-McKitterick.com
Goodreads
The Internet Speculative Fiction Database
SFWA Speaker's Bureau
Patreon
Pillowfort
Tumblr (narrow it down by going to my Science Fiction tags; writers, check out my various Writing Tips tags)
YouTube
Wikipedia
Daily in meeting area after discussions, often beforehand at the Union restaurant (everyone is invited to join and chat!), and in the evenings (we often have dinner downtown, watch and discuss SF movies in the Scholarship Hall, and so forth). Other days and times by appointment.
Class discussion begins at 1:00pm on Monday in a lounge of our scholarship hall (stay tuned for details). Several of us will meet for lunch from noon to 12:45pm or so just up the hill in the Union cafeteria, where you also might have the opportunity to chat with James Gunn. We'll have someone at the front doors to let in those not staying in the Hall, so be sure to arrive between 12:45pm and 12:50pm - no later! - so we can get you through the doors. Please do not be tardy, as this interrupts the discussion.
The Campbell Conference used to meet in the Kansas Union, just a couple of blocks from our meeting space.
You will find this handy Readings Guide very useful in finding the stories in our various volumes (for reference only - see the syllabus, below, for which stories we read, when). Always read the short essays that introduce each story, as well as the book introductions whenever we start a new volume.
Each day, one or two students help lead discussion, bringing enough good questions to keep a lively discussion going for the class period; aim for at least three questions and discussion prompts per story. (Your instructor also brings lots of his own prompts and notes, so you're not alone.) Discussants should also seek relevant information about the authors, how the stories influenced the science fiction that was to follow. You must lead the daily discussion at least once alone or twice with a partner, but may serve more often. This is a major part of your grade and an important learning opportunity.
Graduate students: In preparation for each session, find, read, and respond to additional short (or long, if you choose) work that represents the week's topic, time period, author, or literary movement. Include your response to this work as part of your regular response paper. If you find it online, provide a link in your response paper. Otherwise, include bibliographic information. Also please share these recommendations for your classmates via the Blackboard discussion forum.
Have you accepted the invitation to join our class Google Group? If not, or if you're using a different email than what you registered with KU, please request to join the Google Group called, [this year's] Science Fiction Short Story Institute."
Participants were strongly encouraged to register for and attend the Campbell Conference. There you can meet many authors and editors (including the winners of the Campbell Award, Sturgeon Award, and Lifeboat to the Stars Award), get books signed, and participate in a unique scholarly event in the field. Attendees of the Conference get up to 10 bonus points for attending and writing up a thoughtful response to the event.
Syllabus last updated February 28, 2022.
Download a .pdf of the readings here, or a .doc file here.
Road to SF Volume |
Readings for Class Discussion (and publication dates). Also read all of Gunn's story introductions. |
Authors |
|---|---|---|
|
n/a |
"What is science fiction?" The definitions of SF on the Wikipedia page. Here is a set of definitions (doc file) that I quote from throughout the course. James Gunn's essay, "The Worldview of Science Fiction." (Gunn founded the Center.) Check out Ward Shelly's excellent "History of Science Fiction" illustration.
|
various |
|
vol 1 |
Volume 1 introduction |
|
|
vol 1 |
excerpt from Frankenstein (1818 anonymous; 1823 Shelley) |
|
|
vol 1 |
"Rappaccini's Daughter" (1844) |
|
|
vol 1 |
"The Diamond Lens" (1858) |
|
|
vol 3 |
"The Cold Equations" (1954) |
|
|
vol 3 |
"The Engine at Heartspring's Center" (1974) |
Roger Zelazny |
|
vol 1 |
"The Star" (1897) |
H.G. Wells |
|
vol 2 |
"The Machine Stops" (1909) |
E.M. Forster |
|
vol 2 |
"Twilight" (1934) |
|
|
Introductions, course and syllabus overview, discussion leaders sign-up. McKitterick leads the discussion for this first week, so bring your thoughts, questions, and maybe even your reading response to help guide your thoughts. Prepare to discuss your take on "What is SF?" Your reading response paper for this session is about the stories and other readings above, plus your own definition of science fiction. Always complete these before class. |
||
|
vol 1 |
excerpt from A True Story (165 - 170 AD) |
Lucian of Samosata |
|
vol 1 |
excerpt from The Voyages and Travels of Sir John Mandeville (1357-1380) |
Anonymous |
|
vol 1 |
"Somnium or Lunar Astronomy" (1610, published 1640) |
Johannes Kepler |
|
vol 1 |
excerpt from The Journey to the World Underground (1741) |
Ludvig Holberg |
|
vol 1 |
"Mellonta Tauta" (1849) |
Edgar Allan Poe |
|
vol 1 |
excerpt from Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea (1870) |
Jules Verne |
|
vol 1 |
excerpt from Around the Moon (1870) |
Jules Verne |
|
vol 1 |
excerpt from Looking Backward (1887) |
Edward Bellamy |
|
vol 1 |
"With the Night Mail" (1905) |
Rudyard Kipling |
|
vol 1 |
excerpt from Utopia (1516) |
Thomas More |
|
vol 1 |
excerpt from The City of the Sun (1623) |
Tommaso Campanella |
|
vol 1 |
excerpt from The New Atlantis (1627) |
Sir Francis Bacon |
|
Want to read more proto-SF? Check out this page about some of the earliest speculative-fiction literature. "Kepler's Somnium: Science Fiction and the Renaissance Scientist," by Gale E. Christianson (in Science Fiction Studies online). "KEPLER'S SOMNIUM," by Andrew Boyd (in Engines of Our Ingenuity online). | ||
|
vol 2 |
Volume 2 introduction |
|
|
vol 1 |
excerpt from A Voyage to the Moon (1657; Gutenberg edition) |
Cyrano de Bergerac |
|
vol 1 |
excerpt from A Voyage to Laputa (from Gulliver's Travels, 1726) |
Jonathan Swift |
|
vol 1 |
"Micromegas" (1752) |
Francois Marie Arouet de Voltaire |
|
vol 2 |
"The Revolt of the Pedestrians" (1928) |
David H. Keller, M.D. |
|
vol 2 |
excerpt from Brave New World (1932) |
Aldous Huxley |
|
vol 1 |
"The Damned Thing" (1898) |
Ambrose Bierce |
|
vol 2 |
"The Moon Pool" (1918 [in 2002 RtSF edition only; link is full book version]) |
A. Merritt |
|
vol 2 |
"The Red One" (1918) |
Jack London |
|
vol 2 |
"Dagon" (1919) |
H.P. Lovecraft |
|
vol 1 |
excerpt from She (1887) |
H. Rider Haggard |
|
vol 2 |
From Under the Moons of Mars (aka A Princess of Mars, 1912) |
Edgar Rice Burroughs |
|
vol 2 |
"A Martian Odyssey" (1934) |
Stanley G. Weinbaum |
|
vol 2 |
"Proxima Centauri" (1935) |
Murray Leinster |
|
vol 2 |
"Black Destroyer" (1939) |
A.E. van Vogt |
|
vol 2 |
"The New Accelerator" (1901) |
H.G. Wells |
|
vol 2 |
"The Tissue-Culture King" (1927) |
Julian Huxley |
|
vol 2 |
"With Folded Hands" (1947) |
Jack Williamson |
|
vol 3 |
"Brooklyn Project" (1948) |
William Tenn (Philip Klass) |
|
vol 3 |
Volume 3 introduction |
|
|
vol 2 |
excerpt from Last and First Men (1930) |
Olaf Stapledon |
|
vol 2 |
"What's It Like Out There?" (1952) |
Edmond Hamilton |
|
vol 2 |
"The Faithful" (1938) |
Lester del Rey |
|
vol 2 |
"Requiem" (1939) |
Robert A. Heinlein |
|
vol 2 |
"Hyperpilosity" (1938) |
L. Sprague de Camp |
|
vol 2 |
"Nightfall" (1941) |
Isaac Asimov |
|
vol 3 |
"Reason" (1941) |
Isaac Asimov |
|
vol 3 |
"Critical Factor" (1953) |
Hal Clement |
We'll start with an round-robin reading of " Sail On! Sail On!" led by your instructor. |
||
|
"The Science Fiction Sentence" "The Protocols of Science Fiction" Also check out C.P. Snow's "The Two Cultures" talk (pdf). |
Various |
|
|
vol 3 |
"Sail On! Sail On!" (1952) For our live-reading convenience, here's a pdf of the story online. We will do a close reading of this story to discuss the protocols of SF: How do we read SF differently than other literature? What is the "science fiction sentence"? How do "the two cultures" read differently? |
Philip Jose Farmer |
|
vol 3 |
"All You Zombies" (1959) Check out this timeline of the story. |
Robert A. Heinlein |
|
vol 3 |
"We Can Remember It for You Wholesale" (1966) |
Philip K. Dick |
|
vol 3 |
"Sundance" (1969) |
Robert Silverberg |
|
vol 3 |
"Desertion" (1944) |
Clifford D. Simak |
|
vol 3 |
"The Game of Rat and Dragon" (1955) |
Cordwainer Smith |
|
vol 3 |
"Who Can Replace a Man?" (1958) |
Brian W. Aldiss |
|
vol 3 |
"Dolphin's Way" (1964) |
Gordon R. Dickson |
|
vol 3 |
"Day Million" (1966 [hear Pohl reading this piece here]) |
|
|
vol 3 |
"Tricentennial" (1976) |
Joe Haldeman |
|
vol 3 |
"The Million-Year Picnic" (1946) |
Ray Bradbury |
|
vol 3 |
"Thunder and Roses" (1947) |
Theodore Sturgeon |
|
vol 3 |
"That Only a Mother" (1948) |
Judith Merril |
|
vol 3 |
"The Terminal Beach" (1964) |
J. G. Ballard |
|
vol 3 |
"The Big Flash" (1969) |
Norman Spinrad |
|
vol 3 |
"Mimsy Were the Borogoves" (1943) |
Lewis Padgett (Henry Kuttner and C. L. Moore) |
|
vol 3 |
"The Sentinel" (1951) |
Arthur C. Clarke |
|
vol 3 |
"Kyrie" (1968) |
Poul Anderson |
|
vol 4 |
"Schrödinger's Kitten" (1988) |
George Alec Effinger |
|
vol 3 |
"Coming Attraction" (1950) |
Fritz Leiber |
|
vol 3 |
"Harrison Bergeron" (1961) |
Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. |
|
vol 3 |
"Slow Tuesday Night" (1965) |
R. A. Lafferty |
|
vol 3 |
"Aye, and Gomorrah" (1967) |
Samuel R. Delany |
|
vol 3 |
"The Jigsaw Man" (1967) |
Larry Niven |
|
vol 3 |
excerpt from Stand on Zanzibar (1968) |
John Brunner |
|
vol 4 |
Volume 4 introduction |
|
|
vol 3 |
"Fondly Fahrenheit" (1954) |
Alfred Bester |
|
vol 3 |
"Pilgrimage to Earth" (1956) |
Robert Sheckley |
|
vol 3 |
"The Streets of Ashkelon" (1962) |
Harry Harrison |
|
vol 3 |
"I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream" (1967) |
Harlan Ellison |
|
vol 3 |
"Masks" (1968) |
Damon Knight |
|
vol 3 |
excerpt from The Left Hand of Darkness (1969) |
Ursula K. Le Guin |
|
vol 3 |
"When It Changed" (1972) |
Joanna Russ |
|
vol 4 |
"The heat death of the Universe" (1967) |
Pamela Zoline |
|
vol 4 |
"Of Mist, and Grass, and Sand" (1973) |
Vonda N. McIntyre |
|
vol 4 |
"Abominable" (1980) |
Carol Emshwiller |
|
vol 4 |
"Born of Man and Woman" (1978) |
Richard Matheson |
|
vol 4 |
"Common Time" (1953) |
James Blish |
|
vol 4 |
"Nobody Bothers Gus" (1968) |
Algis Budrys (McKitterick's first literary agent) |
|
vol 4 |
"The Dance of the Changer and the Three" (1968) |
Terry Carr |
|
vol 4 |
"The Last Flight of Dr. Ain" (1974) |
James Tiptree, Jr. (Alice Sheldon) |
|
vol 4 |
"View from a Height" (1979) |
Joan D. Vinge |
|
vol 4 |
"Flowers for Algernon" (1959) |
Daniel Keyes |
|
vol 4 |
excerpt from Dune (1965) |
Frank Herbert |
|
vol 4 |
"The Island of Doctor Death and Other Stories" (1970) |
Gene Wolfe |
|
vol 4 |
"Gather Blue Roses" (1971) |
Pamela Sargent |
|
vol 4 |
"The Library of Babel" (1941) |
Jorge Luis Borges |
|
vol 4 |
"With a Finger in My I" (1972) |
David Gerrold |
|
vol 4 |
"Rogue Tomato" (1975) |
Michael Bishop |
|
vol 4 |
"The Word Sweep" (1979) |
George Zebrowski |
|
vol 4 |
"The Luckiest Man in Denv" (1952) |
C.M. Kornbluth |
|
vol 4 |
"Where No Sun Shines" (1970) |
Gardner Dozois |
|
vol 4 |
"Angouleme" (1971) |
Thomas M. Disch |
|
vol 4 |
"Uncoupling" (1975) |
Barry Malzberg |
|
vol 4 |
"This Tower of Ashes" (1976) |
George R.R. Martin |
|
vol 4 |
"My Boy Friend's Name is Jello" (1954) |
Avram Davidson |
|
vol 4 |
"The First Sally (A), or Trurl's Electronic Bard" (1974, part of The Cyberiad) |
Stanislaw Lem |
|
vol 4 |
"The World Science Fiction Convention of 2080" (1980) |
Ian Watson |
|
vol 4 |
"The Moon Moth" (1961) |
Jack Vance |
|
vol 4 |
"Light of Other Days" (1966) |
Bob Shaw |
|
vol 4 |
"The Planners" (1968) |
Kate Wilhelm |
|
vol 4 |
"Air Raid" (1977) |
John Varley |
|
vol 4 |
"Particle Theory" (1977) |
Edward Bryant |
|
vol 4 |
"Exposures" (1981) |
Gregory Benford |
online |
Contemporary story - |
|
TBA - submit recommendations for contemporary SF (since 2000) | |
|---|---|
|
"The Man Who Sold the Moon" (2015) Sturgeon Award winner; response to Heinlein's story. From Hieroglyph: Stories and Visions for a Better Future. |
|
"Herd Immunity" (2014) This story was a finalist for the Sturgeon Award, and the author won the British Fantasy Award and National Book Award. |
|
"The City Born Great" (2016) Hugo Award nominee. |
|
"Folding Beijing" (2015) Won the 2016 Hugo Award - she's the first Chinese author to win this award. Finalist for the Sturgeon Award. |
Hao Jingfang (translated by Ken Liu) |
"Names for Water" (2010) - see TBA for text, StarShipSofa for podcast. Kij is a KU creative-writing professor and the Institute's Associate Director, and the winner of numerous spec-fic awards. Meet the author: Kij will join us today! |
|
"Paradox" (2017) (Or "Cat Pictures Please" [2015] - won the Hugo Award.) |
|
"The Night Market" (2016) Onwualu grew up in Abuja, Nigeria, and now lives in Toronto. She attended the Gunn Center summer workshops and Clarion West, edits and co-founded Omenana (a magazine of African speculative fiction), and is lead spokesperson for the African Speculative Fiction Society. |
|
"Jagannath" (2012) - ask for text, Drabblecast for podcast. |
|
"Utopia, LOL?" (2017) |
|
|
What comes next for science fiction? More bonus material (not stories, but great materials for discussion): "Sci-fi stories that imagine a future Africa" (2017), Nnedi Okorafor's TED Talk on YouTube (here it is on TED). "My science fiction has different ancestors - African ones," she says. Between excerpts from Binti and Lagoon, Okorafor discusses the inspiration and roots of her work, and how she opens strange doors through Afrofuturist writing. Science Fiction Studies dedicated a special issue to the topic (seven articles here). Good piece about Afrofuturism in ThinkProgress. Another region that's seeing huge growth in speculative-fiction culture is China. Check out the Future Affairs Administration, a Beijing-based group that operates very much as the Futurians did in 1930s US! James Gunn's commentary on "The Future of Science Fiction." Will SF return to its roots? Read this short article on the return of Space Opera. ...or will it be something completely different, like "Solarpunk" (great discussion with resources about Solarpunk here)? If that sounds interesting, check out the resources on Solarpunk: A Reference Guide (by the people who run the Solarpunks Tumblr). For an example, check out the Hieroglyph project, at Arizona State University's Center for Science and the Imagination. Can science fiction be defined? Read the BBC's take. Read "Not a Manifesto," Charles Stross' explanation of why he's moving away from writing science fiction - this from the man who coined the term "rapture of the nerds" and is at least partly responsible for launching the posthuman-SF subgenre.
|
|
|
Want even more short SF? Check out the finalists for the Theodore Sturgeon Memorial Award for best short SF of the year. This juried award really does represent the best short SF, even if your favorite might one of the other finalists rather than the winner. Also check out the Hugo Awards, given each year by the attendees of the World SF Convention. They give awards for many categories. And the Nebula Awards, given each year by the Science Fiction Writers of America (the professional organization). Also many categories. Same for the Locus Awards (this link goes to their all-awards news page), whose nominations and votes come from the serious readers of that magazine. |
|
These materials are all bonus - you recommend 'em (or we'll pick), and your response (beyond your thoughts on the current state and future shape of SF) is pure bonus. Level Up bonus points to those who rec great, influential, and discussion-worthy stories, especially from under-represented groups. More to come... |
|
The readings all come from James Gunn's wonderful The Road to Science Fiction series of anthologies. The students assigned as discussants for the day lead (not monopolize) the discussion. Everyone is required to act as discussant at least twice during the courses. If you have special needs and cannot perform this task, let me know early.
Discussants perform additional research prior to class (further readings, identifying possible multimedia content, and so forth) and come prepared with three or more questions per reading in order to stimulate discussion about the day's topics and authors beyond the readings and share what you learn with the rest of the class, as well. I expect all students to participate in discussions, but also request that you avoid talking too much or talking over others. Be civil: These are discussions about ideas, not arguments or lectures!
Graduate students and teachers: I expect you to demonstrate solid pedagogical theory! Act as if you're teaching this course for a day. I expect you to participate every day, providing insightful comments and questions while encouraging those less inclined to participate - but not to dominate the discussions.
We will read most of the stories in the first four volumes of The Road to Science Fiction, edited by James Gunn. The titles below contain links to online booksellers like Amazon and Powell's; click these links to find the books for sale online:
For further reading, Gunn also edited two more volumes (not required reading):
To get a full feel of the complete works from which we read a number of excerpts, be sure to look them up - most are in the public domain.
Want more great SF stories? Check out the finalists for the Theodore Sturgeon Memorial Award for best short SF of the year. Here's a good list of SF magazines. Want lots of free SF ebooks and e-zines? Check out Project Gutenberg's growing SF collection.
Want to read books, instead? See the finalists for the John W. Campbell Memorial Award for best SF novel of the year. Most years, the majority of those works could have won the award if the jury had just a few different members. You can find tons more great SF novels in the Basic Science Fiction Library. Also recommended are the complete works from which we read a number of excerpts.
The Center holds a few copies of many of these books, so if you are local to Lawrence or are in town for our other summer programs, check with us to see if we can lend you a copy. These are available on a first-come, first-served basis, and our library is supplied by previous students donating copies after completing their course.
More to come! Check back later....
To successfully complete the 2020 (online-only) course and get out of it all you can, you are required to:
Each day we gather in one of the lounges of our scholarship hall to discuss a variety of stories, their authors, the science fiction genre, and the historical context in which they appeared. Occasionally, we might have guest speakers.
Participants are also welcome to lunch from noon - 12:45pm with Chris McKitterick, often James Gunn (SFWA Grant Master who first developed the course and CSSF Founding Director), and often Kij Johnson (multiple award-winning author and CSSF Associate Director), as well as dine out in the evenings in lovely downtown Lawrence, attend movies in the theater or gather informally for movies in the scholarship hall, engage in discussions, and so forth.
Class periods revolve largely around discussion of the readings, with some lecture. We meet every day for twelve consecutive days, including the Saturday and Sunday between those two weeks, and plan to be in Lawrence for the Campbell Conference before class begins to get a glimpse inside SF today.
Participants were strongly encouraged to register for and attend the Campbell Conference, where you could meet many authors and editors (including the winners of the Campbell Award and Sturgeon Award), get books signed, and participate in a unique scholarly event in the field. Attendees of the Conference get up to 10 bonus points for attending and writing up a response to the event! Institute participants may register for the Conference at no cost - note that you are an Institute student in your registration form (if you want dinner during the Awards ceremony on Friday night, you must still pay for your meal).
After an introduction to the topic by your instructor, 1-2 students assigned as discussants for each day lead (not monopolize) the discussions. Everyone is required to act as discussant at least once (alone) or twice (with a partner) during the 12 days we meet, and you can get bonus points for leading the discussion more times if we're short of volunteers. If you have special needs and cannot perform this task, let me know early. I will assign discussants on this page (in the daily readings, above), on a first-requested, first-granted basis, so if you have favorite works whose discussions you want to lead, let me know ASAP! We'll have a "Discussants request" email in late May or early June.
Discussants perform additional research prior to class (further readings on the genre movements at hand, the day's authors, and so forth) and come prepared with questions and discussion prompts: prep at least a few questions per story, and aim for at least a dozen questions per day, or enough to stimulate 2-3 hours of discussion about the readings and the day's topic.
We expect all students to participate in discussions, but also request that you avoid talking too much or talking over others. Be civil: These are discussions about ideas, not arguments!
Your instructor opens each day with some background on science fiction, especially the topics and genre movements relevant to the day's discussions, and some information about the authors. After that, the day's student discussants take over. You can split up the tasks among your fellow discussants based on stories, topics, or however you see fit. We simply expect everyone to serve equally.
Graduate students and teachers: We expect you to demonstrate solid pedagogical theory! Act as if you're teaching this course for a day.
This is a discussion course, so class participation is weighed heavily! Coming to class and getting involved in the discussions each day are necessary for getting a good grade, not to mention how much value you get from the course. The discussions aren't just explication of plot or concept, though we will discuss those; we expect you to exercise your critical-reading skills. That is, don't just read the fiction for pleasure, don't just accept the scholarship or introductions as canon, and don't feel the need to agree with your classmates' ideas - no one scholar can tell you the One True History of Science Fiction. By the end of this course you should possess expertise of your own in the topic. In the discussions, we want to witness your growing understanding of the genre based on the required readings, your outside readings, and your own experience with SF over the years. Of course, be polite and diplomatic if you disagree, but don't be shy either.
If you know you are going to miss a class for an academic event, illness, or other excusable reason, contact us as soon as possible to see if we can work out something so it does not negatively affect your overall grade too much. If appropriate, we can mitigate this loss so your attendance percentage remains unaffected. Otherwise, here is how we score attendance and participation:
Because we only meet for 12 consecutive days, each unexcused absence drops your final course grade by a third; that is, missing a day might mean your final grade drops from an A- to a B+, missing three drops it to a B, and so forth. Missing zero classes usually serves to bump most students up a fraction of a grade (for example, from a B to a B+ when points are close), so don't miss classes! The next table illustrates this relationship.
Graduate students and teachers: I expect you to participate every day, providing insightful comments and questions while encouraging those less inclined to participate - but not to dominate the discussions.
For those taking the course for credit, here is how we grade attendance and participation:
| Classes Missed | Grade Result (assuming perfect score) |
|---|---|
| 0 | A (bonus effect if you actively participate in all discussions) |
| 1 | A- (minor effect) |
| 2 | B+ |
| 3 |
B |
| 4 | B- |
| 5 | C+ |
| And so forth | 1/3 grade per missed class |
During discussions, avoid distractions such as checking email, Facebook, and so forth. Obviously, turn off your phone ring/buzz and put it away. We know it's sometimes a challenge to focus during a long discussion, but many recent studies show that the human mind cannot pay attention to more than one thing at a time, and fracturing your attention means you're not getting everything possible out of each discussion. Monkeying around online also interrupts your neighbors' attention. Feel free to take notes on your computer or portable device if you choose, just stay away from distractions. It's difficult to remain engaged in discussions if your mind is elsewhere, and this also bumps down your overall grade. On the other hand, actively participating in class discussions bumps up your overall grade.
I'm sure you have heard this before, but it is as true as ever: You get out of any activity only what you put into it. The more effort and creativity you apply to your projects and to class discussions, the more you will learn and the better the class will be for everyone else, as well. If you do not regularly attend class or do not participate in discussions, you will miss out on a lot of opportunities to learn and grow as a person.
For those taking the course for credit, much of your grade depends on the short response papers you write on each story covered in the daily discussions, plus the longer final project. If you use non-standard software to create your projects, be sure to save them in standard format (for example, most computers can read .doc, .html, .rtf, and .pdf formats). (If taking for professionalization and not for credit, you are not required to write papers.)
Want to enhance your literary-criticism chops by incorporating traditional (or novel) lit-crit approaches into your papers? Check out this overview page about "Literary-Criticism Approaches to Studying Science Fiction."
Prior to each class, write a short reading-response paper and turn it in to your instructor (via Blackboard for KU students). This short (300-500 words for undergrads, 400-1000 words for graduate students) paper is a brief but thoughtful response to all readings for that day. Insightfulness and clarity are important. Along with participation in the discussion, these papers are scored as an important measure of your engagement with the day's topics. Participants taking the course not-for-credit are not expected to turn in daily responses, though you may if you wish - let me know in advance so I can add you to our mailing list.
Regarding format, I find it simplest when people either use bullets, bold the reading titles, or use the titles as headings. Some people write responses that resemble essays, citing the works in tandem, while others just respond to each individually; either way is fine, but what's most important is that you've thought through all the readings for each day and their relationship to one another as well as to SF's evolution.
Tip: Especially in years when we meet for discussion, include questions to pose to the other participants as well as some points to stimulate discussion, even if you are not leading the week's discussion. I suggest printing out your paper and especially your questions and bringing them to class to help formulate ideas during discussion. (Also be sure to turn them in before class.)
Graduate students and teachers: As you might imagine, I expect more from your papers. They should reflect your mastery of the form as well as provide insights worthy of your added experience and education.
Here is how I score the daily papers, based on 0-4 points each:
0 - no paper.
1 - paper turned in, but does not convince me that you
did all the reading.
2 - paper convinces me that you did some of the
reading.
3 - paper either has interesting insights on most of the readings or convinces
me
that you did all the reading.
4 - paper convinces me that you did all the reading
and provides interesting
insights.
Response papers are due before the relevant class discussion begins. Those turned in after we meet to discuss those stories are considered late and are marked down -1 point if turned in on the evening of the discussion, -2 points (half off) if turned in later. The last day to turn in any paper is (tba). Turn them in on time!
The final project can be either a traditional essay, a set of teaching materials, or a creative work. Your project explores a topic in science fiction, preferably something not listed in the syllabus or discussed in class - though you may pursue those if you select an angle we didn't already cover or discuss. Projects must be at least 2000 words for undergraduates (max of max of 7500 words), 3000 words for graduate students (max of 10,000 words). Non-text-based projects must clearly demonstrate a similar level of effort.
This project is due by (tba).
At the very least, answer this question:
How does the work(s) you're analyzing or creating fit into the larger discussion that is science fiction? What does it add? What are its influences? What is it responding to? How does it extend what you think of as "science fiction"? Discuss as usual in a scholarly piece, or define in your creative piece's artist statement.
Some resources you might find useful:
You must include an alphabetized bibliography with a traditional paper or lesson plan, or an annotated bibliography at the end of your document if it is a creative work. An annotated bibliography is a set of references that provide a summary of your readings and research, to give me an idea of where you got your inspiration, scientific or technical resources, and so forth. List your sources alphabetically and include a brief summary or annotation for each work that you quote in the paper or that you use as a reference (or inspiration). Format your bibliography as appropriate for your field of study (MLA for much of the Humanities, Chicago for most other fields, and so forth; here's a good list of style guides).
References, bibliographies, artist's statements, and endnote pages do not count toward your word-count.
Grad students and teachers: In addition to the basics of writing an insightful paper, I expect you to demonstrate mastery of the form.
Participants taking the course not-for-credit are not expected to turn in a final project, though you may if you wish.
Formal papers are graded on the quality and diversity of research (both fictional and non-fictional), the writing (including grammar and spelling), and the strength of the topic and argument. What I most want is for you to demonstrate what you've learned from the class readings, your outside readings, and class discussions, and how you express this synthesis: Demonstrate your understanding of science fiction, its development, and possibly where it might go from here.
This is not something that you can successfully complete at the last minute. This paper should represent a summer-long investigation of topics that interest you. If you wish to use stories from the assigned readings that we discussed in class, I expect you to have something new to say that we didn't already discuss.
This option is especially for educators and those planning to teach. Choose from these three options or provide another option that fits your pedagogical approach:
All of these options make wonderful additions to AboutSF.org! I encourage you to share this project with other teachers via this educational-outreach program.
A creative work (story, series of poems, play, short film, website, creative nonfiction, and so forth) must dramatize how the changes posed in your work could affect believable, interesting characters living in a convincing, fully realized world in addition to revealing substantial understanding of the science fiction genre. For the purposes of this course, your annotated bibliography (normally not included in creative work) is particularly important if you pursue this option, because I want to see the diversity of readings that helped you develop your work (both fictional and non-fictional). Show me your research with a good annotated bibliography, demonstrate your understanding of science fiction, and make your creative work stand on its own.
To be crystal-clear in defining how your creative work displays your understanding of SF, its history, and your response to it, also include an "artist's statement," as it very much helps me in evaluating creative work. Write this either as an appendix to your document (but don't count this toward your word-count) or (for KU students) paste it into the Submission text box of the Blackboard assignment slot.
Be aware that this option is more challenging - especially if you haven't taken formal creative-writing courses - because we expect the same level of research as in the other options plus a good story or other creative expression. Click here for some useful creative-writing resources.
Your final project is due (tba - earlier is fine). If you've created a website, posted a short film to the internet, or otherwise cannot upload the project directly, just provide a link (website URL) to the project.
Your course grade is based on these factors:
Your course grade is based upon these factors:
Graduate students and teachers: As you might imagine, I expect more from you. Your work must reflect your mastery of the paper form, provide insights worthy of your added experience and education, and reflect a broader understanding of the genre, critical approaches, and SF's place in literature and broader culture. See the comments directed to you throughout this document!
Want to read more SF? You've come to the right place!
My lending library holds many books, magazines, and more, so if you are local to Lawrence or are in town for the summer, check with McKitterick to see if we can lend you a copy. These are available on a first-come, first-served basis. We also have a course-specific lending library for our SF courses - which is primarily supplied by previous students donating copies after completing their course - so if you want to pass on the love to the next generation rather than keep your books, let your teacher know!
Want more? Check out the finalists for the John W. Campbell Memorial Award for best SF novel of the year, and the finalists for the Theodore Sturgeon Memorial Award for best short SF of the year. Many years, the majority of those works could have won these awards if the juries had just a few different members.
Want lots of free SF ebooks and e-zines? Check out Project Gutenberg's growing SF collection.
Want even more recommendations? James Gunn's and my "A Basic Science Fiction Library" is a go-to internet resource for building reading lists. It's organized by author.
Want to take more speculative-fiction courses? You're in luck! Check out our growing list of offerings.
Go here to see lots more resources on this site.
If you like novels, or just want to prepare for next year's SF-novels version of this course, here you go:
And here are the books that we removed from the SF-novels version of this course - still important and recommended works for understanding the history of the SF novel, but we only have so much time to discuss:
McKitterick was on Minnesota Public Radio's "The Daily Circuit" show in June 2012, which was a "summer reading" show dedicated to spec-fic and remembering Ray Bradbury. Great to see Public Radio continuing to cover SF after their "100 Best SF Novels" list. Here's what he added to the show's blog:
A great resource for finding wonderful SF is to check out the winners and finalists for the major awards. For example, here's a list of the John W. Campbell Memorial Award winners. And here's a list of recent finalists for the Award. Here's the list of the Nebula Award novel winners. And the Hugo Award winners, which has links to each year's finalists, as well. A couple of books I didn't get a chance to mention include Ray Bradbury's R Is for Rocket, which contains a story that turned me into an author: "The Rocket" (along with Heinlein's Rocketship Galileo and Madeleine L'Engle's A Wrinkle in Time). Bradbury's Dandelion Wine is another, along with books like Frank Herbert's Dune, Douglas Adams' The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, Clifford Simak's City (a Minnesota native), SF anthologies like James Gunn's Road to Science Fiction and the DAW Annual Year's Best SF, and tons more. Personally, my favorite Bradbury short story is pretty much everything Bradbury every wrote. His writing is moving and evocative like Simak and Theodore Sturgeon's - probably why those three made such an impression on the young-me. But if I had to pick only one that most influenced me as a writer, it would probably be "The Rocket," a beautiful story about a junk-man who has to decide between his personal dreams of space and love of his family. It was adapted into a radio show for NBC's "Short Story" series (you can listen to the MP3 audio recording here).
He was also on again in September 2012, when they did a story on "What did science fiction writers predict for 2012?" The other guest was a futurist - an interesting discussion!
Stay tuned for more to come!
* "'History of Science Fiction' is a graphic chronology that maps the literary genre from its nascent roots in mythology and fantastic stories to the somewhat calcified post-Star Wars space opera epics of today. The movement of years is from left to right, tracing the figure of a tentacled beast, derived from H.G. Wells' War of the Worlds Martians. Science Fiction is seen as the offspring of the collision of the Enlightenment (providing science) and Romanticism, which birthed gothic fiction, source of not only SF, but crime novels, horror, westerns, and fantasy (all of which can be seen exiting through wormholes to their own diagrams, elsewhere). Science fiction progressed through a number of distinct periods, which are charted, citing hundreds of the most important works and authors. Film and television are covered as well."
- Ward Shelly discussing this excellent "History of Science Fiction" infographic - now available for purchase!
We believe strongly in the free sharing of information, so you'll find a lot of content - including course syllabi and many materials from our classes - on this and related sites and social networks as educational outreach. Feel free to use this content for independent study, or to adapt it for your own educational and nonprofit purposes; just please credit us and link back to this website. We'd also love to hear from you if you used our materials!
This site is associated with the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America (SFWA), the Science Fiction Research Association (SFRA), AboutSF, and other organizations, and its contents are copyright 1992-present Christopher McKitterick except where noted, and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: Feel free to use and adapt for non-profit purposes, with attribution. For publication or profit purposes, please contact McKitterick or other creators as noted.

Works on this site are licensed under a Creative
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
updated 6/28/2022