As we prepare our notes for the upcoming workshop, here a few things to help make this the best possible experience for everyone. For those of you familiar with academia, think of this as a sort of syllabus - also guidelines for future workshops and professional submissions.
Prepping your story
Critiquing stories
Live workshopping
Closing thoughts
McKitterick bio
Related writing workshops and resources
Some useful stuff to prepare for my Speculative-Fiction Writing Workshop, "Repeat Offenders" advanced workshop for alums, and AdAstranaut "Science into Fiction" Spec-Fic Workshops:
First off, to keep them organized for everyone, please title your files with your last (and first if you want) name and the title or a word or two from the title. This is a good idea not just for our Workshop, but also helps editors when you submit for publication. An example might be McKitterick-Lutefisk-Monkey.doc. (when submitting books and such to editors, also use something that identifies if your submission is an outline or specific chapters). Your best option is to save them as .doc files (or .docx, or .rtf if you're using some program that can't do .doc) so everyone can read them. Some people like .pdf files, but most of us can't mark those up, and many like to comment directly in the document file itself, so don't send .pdf files except on editorial request. And as much as you might appreciate the virtues of Scrivener or your 1997 copy of Word Perfect, avoid oddball document types.
Practice being a professional right away. Here's how you need to format your manuscripts so editors will take you seriously (and so we don't get bogged down with minutiae):
Manuscript Preparation (pdf), by Vonda McIntyre
Proper Manuscript Formatting, by William Shunn.
When submitting elsewhere, follow the instructions if a magazine is looking for a specific file format (a market I recently submitted to wanted only .rtf files) before you submit for publication. Following these guidelines makes you look more professional: When you practice being a professional, you'll soon become one.
If you have specific questions or concerns about your story, please have those prepared to ask at the start of your story's live critique session. This ensure we address your needs while avoiding interfering with your cohorts' fresh reading experience.
Okay, let's get on with the process.
We'll use an ever-evolving process I've found most useful over the years: Everyone reads and critiques everyone else's stories, and then we discuss them in a round-robin format (more on that below). I prefer this over random discussion or lectures because a writer learns as much from critiquing others' stories as from hearing critiques of their own. It also makes for a much more interactive, lively, and involving discussion for all.
First, some preparatory stuff:
How can you be the best critiquer possible? A few things. First, check out SF Grand Master James Gunn's short and excellent essay:
"How to Be a Good Critiquer and Still Remain Friends."
Go ahead and read it now. I'll wait.
Okay, now that you've seen the theory, I recommend starting your critique with what you liked about the story and why. This isn't just to soften up the author (though it helps!), or to help improve this story if they can enhance those elements. The primary value of starting like this is that it helps us recognize things that work and encourages us do those things again and write ever-better work in the future. It's easy to miss our successes.
Then move on to address Goethe's recommendations for critics by framing these questions:
Let this guide your recommendations. Don't think about what you would do with this story; think about what the author was trying to say or do. This makes the critique sessions much more interesting and swifter, as we can focus on the important stuff and areas for general improvement, and wrap up before the night terrors begin their rounds.
Feel free to copyedit, mark typos and spelling and syntax issues, and whatever else comes up. Mark up formatting issues, and make other such markups on the manuscripts (printed or e-doc format), as this helps authors improve their micro-writing and professional appearance - two things vital to publication success. But don't forget to make substantive recommendations about how to best improve the story, and in the larger sense how the writer can improve her next story. It's also important to create a written critique of the stories, too. Here are some thoughts that I share with my undergraduate writing classes - useful for experienced critiquers, as well: Critique Guidelines Sheet (.doc) and the "Live Workshopping" section, below, as your guide.
To prepare for this, read these stories not only as a critiquer, and not only as a reader, but also as an acquisitions editor. These pages are all you know about this story. What works? What doesn't? Would you buy it or recommend that the Big Editor buy it? Why or why not? Does it work for you as a reader? Do you believe in the characters and their situation? Is this a solid, believable story? Does the language and the pacing pull you through? Are you in the presence of genius?
Your written critique need only be a page or two long for each story. What should it contain? Try to frame in your mind the "Platonic ideal" version of the story at hand. What is the author trying to say? If it's not apparent in the story itself, that suggests something the author might need to address. If it's a bunch of things that aren't really focused, that's something else. What gets in the way of the story's perfection? What does it need to attain its optimal state?
Identify these:
Some people prefer to write by hand on a printed manuscript, some prefer to use the digital-editing tools in their writing software, while others prefer to create a separate document file with all their comments. However you want to handle it is fine - pay attention to what the writers request, if they have a preference. But always provide a written critique.
Writing down your critique has two purposes: It forces you, as the reader and critiquer, to really solidify your thinking about a work before discussing it live; and it allows you, as the writer, to have a set of documents about your story, including things we maybe didn't get a chance to talk about. It also means many of us have a piece of paper on which to draw dragons and robots during the conversation. I do both, mark up a print copy and then add larger comments in the digital copy. Go ahead and mark typos, spelling or syntax comments, and whatever else comes up as you read.
Want more on the critique process? Check out "How to Give and Get Good Critique" (.doc), by Randy Henderson.
During our live critique and discussion sessions, we'll go round-robin (alternating between clockwise and counter-clockwise) starting with the person next to the author, each of us speaking in turn without interrupting one another. Please don't use the discussion time for copyedit-level comments - except, if you must, on the larger scale, such as, "I noticed that your sentences use commas in a random fashion." Put those markups on the manuscript itself or comment about them in your critique. In addition to offering specific story comments, I usually use a little time to also discuss general writing theory and practice, micro-writing technique, or other professionalization tips, so leave that to me.
This year I'm adding a new stage to the critique sessions: The author begins by asking specific questions (if they have any), and everyone makes sure to address these in addition to offering their own observations and suggestions. After asking those opening questions, the author remains silent until we've all had our say.
Sometimes that's tough to do when everyone seems to be missing the point. Use this as a time to practice your Zen mastery and to learn from the experience of listening, rather than waste energy defending your work: Why has everyone read the story differently than you intended? How can you make it work in the way you meant? Why didn't your genius shine through to these pedestrian minds? When everyone's had their say, the author has a chance to talk if she or he wishes, or to ask questions for a limited open-discussion time. But hold your tongue until then! Same for the rest of y'all - respect the current critiquer who has the floor. Whether you post your work on a critique forum, or you ask someone for a critique privately, the etiquette is the same:
Does that mean you can't ask questions? Well, that depends. Don't do so during someone's critique, because that distracts and leads down rabbit holes. I'll leave time at the end for open discussion. Also, some critiquers don't want to answer questions. Or they don't have time. Or they've come across someone who confuses "conversation" with "OMG, here's how you were wrong to hate my story." However, most critiquers are happy to clarify what they meant. If they are, they will tell you. If they don't say, ask. Then abide by their answer.
When it comes around to my turn to talk (I'll go last, or just before our guest author when they're on hand), in addition to my own critique I'll use the story to discuss writing recommendations relevant not just to this story but to writing in general, things such as thoughts on character, plot, setting, senses, and more - kind of micro-lectures. I've put together a ton of documents about each of these things and will share those that the story and our discussions bring up, rather than flood you with a bunch of theory right away (you can find many of them here, and linked from there, if you feel like drinking from a fire-hose; I post things there mostly for reference after workshops).
While everyone is giving critiques, you'll see me writing more notes about each story during the discussion. This is because hearing others' thoughts often stimulates more of our own, or responses to other people's thoughts. I find the discussions really useful for my own writing, too, and urge you to consider the same. Half the value of critiquing others' work is what we can learn from their successes and misses. How can you use the feedback you're hearing about other people's work to improve your own?
After your fellow workshoppers is our guest instructor, if we have one. They'll provide their own unique perspective and expertise.
After each story critique's round-robin is done, I'll leave a little time for open discussion where we can talk about the larger issues and awesomenesses of each piece and writing in general. That's when the story's author can ask questions, when others can respond to those who went after them, when we talk craft and art theory relevant to the story at hand, and so forth. Let's cap this time at no more than 5-10 minutes per story, though it'll often be shorter - especially when the author is overwhelmed with feedback and has no questions yet. There's plenty of time to continue the conversation at dinner, in the evening, at tomorrow's lunch, or online.
"What if I hate my feedback?" Fair question. At least give your readers' comments careful consideration. Think about why they didn't like a character, why they got bored or lost with the plotting, why they felt the setting was uninteresting, or whatever else didn't work for them. Do that not because you need to placate them, but because it helps your writing. Your job is to listen, analyze what worked and didn't, and come up with solutions about how to address the comments. Likely some people will simply not get what you're trying to do. That can be on them or on your story. But if everyone misses the point or misreads your story, it's probably something to ponder.
Informally, these
writing discussions might go on past the scheduled times - for the summer's
residential spec-fic workshops, pretty much
day and night for the full two weeks, when you'll probably interact
with folks in Kij's workshops and other writers, as well. Now is when you
might, in fact, make writing connections that last a lifetime! Take
advantage of this rare opportunity. There's time enough to sleep when we're done. Use our
specific Google Group or the larger alum Google Group and Ad Astra Discord to stay in
touch, continue critiquing, post publication news, and so forth. Recent
Workshop cohorts stay in touch regularly with writing updates,
support, and other discussion. A
writing group like that - people with shared drives and experience - is a hugely
valuable resource.
Keep in mind that the most important thing you'll learn is not specifically how to revise these stories. You read that right. Optimally, what you'll come away with from our sessions is how to write your best new work in the future based on what you learn over the period of our workshop. Keep your mind open for the big picture, rather than narrowly focused on the individual story at hand - and not just for your own story, but for everyone else's, too. How can you learn from everyone else's successes? What can you learn from other people's misses? How can you avoid making the same mistakes again, or others' mistakes? How can you re-create your own or others' successes?
If you strive to do all of this during our time together, I guarantee that you'll get the most out of the experience, and your writing will vastly improve. Optimally, honing your critique skills on other people's work translates into self-critique mastery, and that leads to writing publishable work. My experience from serving as guest author in James Gunn's SF Workshop from 1992-2010, and then from leading my own ever since, shows that anyone - given enough practice, passion, effort, and an open mind - can eventually write publishable stories. You can, too.
Writers need to have short bios on hand and ready to go whenever you sell a work or an event comes up. Here's what I use:
One line:
Award-winning author, educator, autodidact, public speaker, restorer of machines and injured wildlife, astro-guy, and founding director of the Ad Astra SF Institute.
100-ish words:
Chris McKitterick's work has appeared in many publications (his newest Analog novella won the AnLab Award). His debut novel was Transcendence, and current projects include Ad Astra Road Trip, Empire Ship, Stories from a Perilous Youth, and much more. He's done speaking gigs around the world, run carbon-arc movie projectors, chaired the Campbell and Sturgeon Award juries, directed James Gunn's original Center for the Study of Science Fiction for decades, and runs the nonprofit Ad Astra Institute for Science Fiction & the Speculative Imagination. He's lived in seven states and two countries, but calls Lawrence (Kansas) home, where he writes, teaches, watches the stars, and raises a future SF fan (Harvey) with his wife, Lauren, amid a multitude of critters. He sees surviving his youth as evidence of quantum realities.
Chris McKitterick has lived in seven states and two countries, but calls Lawrence - where he teaches science fiction and writing at the University of Kansas - home. His short work has appeared in many publications (his newest in Analog won the 2019 AnLab Readers' Award), and his debut novel was Transcendence. Current projects include Ad Astra Road Trip, Empire Ship, Stories from a Perilous Youth, a hybrid short-fiction collection and book on writing, and more. He's a popular speaker, Campbell Memorial Award juror and chair, long-time director of James Gunn's original Center for the Study of Science Fiction, and founding director of the Ad Astra Institute for Science Fiction & the Speculative Imagination. He sees surviving his youth as evidence of quantum realities.
Short bio:
Since first seeing print in 1984, McKitterick's award-winning short work has appeared in markets including Abyss & Apex, Aftermaths, Analog (where his newest won the AnLab Readers' Award), Argentus, Artemis, Captain Proton, Discovery Channel Magazine, E-Scape, Extrapolation, Foundation, Global Warming Aftermaths, James Gunn's Ad Astra, Libraries Unlimited, Locus, Mythic Circle, NOTA, Ruins: Extraterrestrial, Sentinels, Sense of Wonder, SFRA Review, Synergy, Tomorrow Speculative Fiction, Top Deck magazine, various TSR publications, Visual Journeys, Westward Weird, World Literature Today, a bowling poem anthology, and elsewhere. A poem of his was also set to music. His newest stories are available in Mission: Tomorrow and the Analog.
His debut novel, Transcendence, is available in its second edition through booksellers everywhere, plus as a free download on his website. He recently finished a far-future novel, Empire Ship, and has several other projects on the burner, including a hybrid short-fiction collection and book on writing, The Galactic Adventures of Jack & Stella and Stories From a Perilous Youth, a humorous memoir of surviving childhood and the Cold War. He wrote the introduction for a nonfiction book about James Gunn (the first ever!), by Michael Page.
McKitterick speaks regularly about science fiction and writing at conferences, conventions, public events, schools, and on webcasts and NPR. Some highlights include giving the keynote talk for the University of Iowa Medical Scientist Training Program's annual research event ("Positive Feedback Loops: Science and Science Fiction") and the UCO Liberal Arts Symposium XXIV ("Science Fiction: Mythologies for a Changing Age"), and serving as a guest of honor and workshop leader at the 2019 China Science Fiction Convention. He'll be Author Guest of Honor at ConStellation 15, where he'll launch his newest book!
Taking a writing workshop with SF Grand Master and Hall of Fame inductee James Gunn launched a 30-year relationship with science fiction at the University of Kansas. After completing a graduate program in SF under his mentorship, McKitterick co-taught Gunn's month-long SF summer program while living in Seattle and working in the gaming and tech industries for several years. In 2002, KU recruited him to teach writing and SF literature full-time. In 2010, he succeeded Gunn as director of his original SF center, until shortly after Gunn's death in 2020, when it was reconfigured into an academic department's unit. In 2021, McKitterick launched the predecessor to the Ad Astra Institute for Science Fiction & the Speculative Imagination to continue his SF mission. McKitterick reorganized and led the Theodore Sturgeon Memorial Award for best short SF, and served as juror and chair for the John W Campbell Memorial Award for best SF novel.
*
Here's my full (work-oriented) bio, and here's the one I usually use.
I'm also on a bunch of social networks (links). Probably the best place to get to know me is through my Tumblr blog (where I go to great length to tag stuff, including useful writing tips - check out this curated writing-tips collection for my SF and fiction-writing classes).
See you soon!
Best,
Chris
Facebook | Instagram | Patreon | Tumblr | Xitter | YouTube | Christopher-McKitterick.com
Speculative-fiction writing resources
"Science into Fiction" Spec-Fic Writing Workshops:
Series 1: "The Higgs Boson in This Particular Universe"
Series 2: "Creativity and the Brain"
Series 3: "Writing in (and about) the Age of Artificial Intelligence"
Series 4: "Six great stories and what makes them work: The science of SF writing"
Series 5: "Writing Spec-Fic Humor" coming
Fall 2026:
apply Summer
2026
Chris McKitterick's Spec-Fic Writing Workshop & Repeat Offenders Workshop
Kij Johnson & Barbara Webb's SF&F Novel Writing Workshops and Masterclasses
We believe strongly in the free sharing of information, so you'll find a lot of content - including course syllabi and many materials from our classes - on this and related sites and social networks as educational outreach. Feel free to use this content for independent study, or to adapt it for your own educational and nonprofit purposes; just please credit us and link back to this website. We'd also love to hear from you if you used our materials!
This site is associated with the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America (SFWA), the Science Fiction Research Association (SFRA), AboutSF, and other organizations, and its contents are copyright 1992-present Christopher McKitterick except where noted, and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: Feel free to use and adapt for non-profit purposes, with attribution. For publication or profit purposes, please contact McKitterick or other creators as noted.
This site does not use cookies and is free from tracking. We do not use or condone the use of machine-generated text or images for educational or creative purposes (except as satire), and do not accept student or teacher work manufactured by algorithms.
Works on this site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
updated 1/12/2026